pixel

Ranking Factors in Local Search in 2026

Ranking factors in local search are the criteria that determine who appears first on Google. Understand what changed in the 2026 study.

It has been just over two years since the publication of the last report on ranking factors in local searches. Since then, the SEO industry has undergone significant changes in how we understand and execute strategies, driven by the growth of large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT and Gemini, especially in informational queries.

Local search, however, has remained relatively isolated from this AI revolution. While websites based on informational content have seen their traffic drop drastically with the introduction of AI Overviews, AI Mode, ChatGPT, Gemini, and others, the search for and discovery of local businesses continues to happen predominantly through Google's local results. This is because, for queries with local intent, this is still a far superior experience to the answers generated by LLMs.

Understanding what influences local rankings and how to optimize them remains extremely valuable for businesses and agencies.

This doesn't mean that local research hasn't changed. It has, and significantly. Keep reading to understand what's new.

Video summary

Watch the video to see the main highlights and conclusions from Darren's research this year.

What is the Local Search Ranking Factors Report?

Local Search Ranking Factors is the leading SEO resource for understanding how to rank in Google's local search results. It was created by David Mihm in 2008 and has been led by Darren Shaw since 2017.

Forty-seven leading local research experts are invited to answer an in-depth, approximately two-hour questionnaire. They evaluate and score 187 factors, in addition to answering open-ended questions about what they believe drives local rankings today. Each factor receives a score from 0 to 5 in the following areas:

  1. Impact on the ranking of the local package/Maps
  2. Impact on local organic ranking
  3. Impact on conversion
  4. Impact on visibility in AI searches (new in 2026)

The scores are consolidated and organized by total impact, indicating which factors experts consider most relevant and which have little or no effect (the so-called "myths" of local SEO).

None of the experts have privileged access to the inner workings of Google's local search algorithm. The list of factors and answers are based on more than a decade of analysis, experience, research, and practical testing of the signals Google uses to evaluate and rank businesses.

Nevertheless, the factors that appear at the top of the lists consistently reflect those that have the greatest impact on the rankings, according to professionals who optimize local businesses on a daily basis.

Local search classification factor groups

Individual factors are organized into the following groups:

Weighting of factor groups for 2026

Research participants estimate the weight that Google assigns to each group of factors within the local search algorithm, both for the local/Maps package and for local organic results. New for 2026, weightings were also assigned to visibility in AI-powered searches.

The data is aggregated into a graph that provides a clear view of the relative importance of each group of signals.

The considerations change over time

The comparative chart shows how experts' perception of the weight of each group has changed over the last six editions of the report.

By 2026, the most relevant changes indicate a greater importance of assessment signals and behavioral signals. This aligns with what has also been observed in practice with clients.

On-page and link signals showed a slight decrease. Social signals were reintroduced in this edition, which likely redistributed some of the weight among the groups.

Here's where Darren's personal perspective comes in: he said he was surprised to see that citations dropped by about half a percentage point, maintaining the downward trend of previous editions. According to him, there was a feeling that the market was beginning to positively reassess the value of citations, possibly in the context of AI research. Even so, Darren believes that AI itself is revealing how crucial citations remain for traditional local SEO as well.

New features for 2026

Visibility in AI-powered search

In this edition, a new column has been added to the factor scoring section: the impact of each factor on the visibility of responses generated by AI-based search engines.

When completing the questionnaire, Darren observed that this metric is, in part, ambiguous. For example, when evaluating a factor such as "Additional Categories in Google Business Profile," the score can vary depending on the AI ​​platform considered. For ChatGPT, the impact would be practically nil, while for Google AI Mode or Gemini, it could be significant, since these tools have direct access to Google data.

Nevertheless, the results of this scoring are particularly valuable and offer a clear roadmap of the most important factors for those wishing to improve visibility in AI responses. It is worthwhile to carefully analyze the visibility factors in AI-powered searches.

New factors added

The list of factors has grown significantly in this edition. 47 new factors have been added, and some of them have already debuted directly in the top 10 of the local package/Maps ranking, given their high relevance to local search rankings.

This table brings together all the new factors, allowing you to sort the columns and compare their importance in each dimension.

(Note: Some factors appear as N/A in the Conversion column because behavioral, link, citation, and social signals were excluded from this section.)

Factor Pack/Maps Local Organic Search with AI Conversion
Business open at the time of search (business hours) 5 129 104 6
Address visible on Google Business Profile (not SAB) 7 95 54 26
Click-through rate (CTR) in Pack/Maps 13 93 130 N/A
Predefined services in GBP 22 145 127 70
Keywords in the titles of personalized services 30 132 111 54
Reviews with photos 44 125 94 27
Photo and video quality 46 116 119 11
Personalized services at GBP 49 148 120 61
Keywords in anchor text of internal links 52 19 51 N/A
Photos submitted by users 77 143 135 56
The "Peak Hours" section indicates high traffic 78 167 179 40
Relevance of photos to categories 79 137 133 22
GBP landing page update 83 53 77 73
Reviews with videos 88 141 114 42
Recent photos in GBP 90 154 151 49
Relevance of videos to categories 95 139 138 32
Company age (opening date in GBP) 99 115 124 58
Recent videos in GBP 100 159 157 62
Website content update 109 25 41 63
Updating content on service pages 112 31 61 68
Frequency of activity of the owner/manager 114 174 155 92
Local topics aligned with keywords 118 121 123 89
Keywords in GBP service descriptions 125 165 139 93
Scannable site structure (headings, bullet points, images) 128 26 10 33
Evaluations with answers to questions 131 131 100 77
Social profiles linked to GBP 132 146 136 85
Site architecture organized by topics 133 21 39 71
FAQs on the GBP landing page 135 74 55 74
Keywords in unlinked mentions of the brand 136 75 47 N/A
Products added to GBP via NMX 137 140 147 50
FAQs on service pages 142 60 43 57
Social media updates in GBP 148 157 159 N/A
Reactions to photos and videos 154 182 168 100
Signs of engagement on the website (scrolling, clicks, etc.) 157 47 145 N/A
Users mentioning the company on social media 158 77 42 N/A
Reactions to evaluations 160 181 166 99
Website content marked with Schema 162 69 44 111
Text with keyword visible in photos (overlay) 165 163 161 97
Recency of posts on social media 168 108 92 N/A
Engagement on social media profiles 173 99 102 N/A
Quality of posts on social media 174 114 107 N/A
WhatsApp/SMS enabled 175 184 182 52
Frequency of posts on social media 179 113 110 N/A
Number of posts on social media 181 117 108 N/A
Keywords in image metadata 182 147 165 119
Title Tag Length 185 119 162 110
Number of followers on social media 187 136 132 N/A

This table brings together all the new factors, allowing you to sort the columns and compare their importance in each dimension.

(Note: Some factors appear as N/A in the Conversion column because behavioral, link, citation, and social signals were excluded from this section.)

FactorPack/MapsLocal OrganicSearch with AIConversion
Business open at the time of search (business hours)51291046
Address visible on Google Business Profile (not SAB)7955426
Click-through rate (CTR) in Pack/Maps1393130N/A
Predefined services in GBP2214512770
Keywords in the titles of personalized services3013211154
Reviews with photos441259427
Photo and video quality4611611911
Personalized services at GBP4914812061
Keywords in anchor text of internal links521951N/A
Photos submitted by users7714313556
The "Peak Hours" section indicates high traffic7816717940
Relevance of photos to categories7913713322
GBP landing page update83537773
Reviews with videos8814111442
Recent photos in GBP9015415149
Relevance of videos to categories9513913832
Company age (opening date in GBP)9911512458
Recent videos in GBP10015915762
Website content update109254163
Updating content on service pages112316168
Frequency of activity of the owner/manager11417415592
Local topics aligned with keywords11812112389
Keywords in GBP service descriptions12516513993
Scannable site structure (headings, bullet points, images)128261033
Evaluations with answers to questions13113110077
Social profiles linked to GBP13214613685
Site architecture organized by topics133213971
FAQs on the GBP landing page135745574
Keywords in unlinked mentions of the brand1367547N/A
Products added to GBP via NMX13714014750
FAQs on service pages142604357
Social media updates in GBP148157159N/A
Reactions to photos and videos154182168100
Signs of engagement on the website (scrolling, clicks, etc.)15747145N/A
Users mentioning the company on social media1587742N/A
Reactions to evaluations16018116699
Website content marked with Schema1626944111
Text with keyword visible in photos (overlay)16516316197
Recency of posts on social media16810892N/A
Engagement on social media profiles17399102N/A
Quality of posts on social media174114107N/A
WhatsApp/SMS enabled17518418252
Frequency of posts on social media179113110N/A
Number of posts on social media181117108N/A
Keywords in image metadata182147165119
Title Tag Length185119162110
Number of followers on social media187136132N/A

In addition, eight new negative or suspension risk factors were included, assessed according to their potential impact.

Factor Negative Impact Risk of Suspension
Too many keywords in the GBP description 21 35
Presence of AI-generated content in the profile 31 25
Excessive keywords in Google posts/updates 38 51
Display address in GBP if you are a service area company (SAB) 39 105
Configure service areas that are more than 2 hours away 53 82
AI-generated photos or videos on your profile 55 45
Overlapping service areas across multiple GBPs 71 102
The website URL redirects to another domain 115 115
FactorNegative ImpactRisk of Suspension
Too many keywords in the GBP description2135
Presence of AI-generated content in the profile3125
Excessive keywords in Google posts/updates3851
Display address in GBP if you are a service area company (SAB)39105
Configure service areas that are more than 2 hours away5382
AI-generated photos or videos on your profile5545
Overlapping service areas across multiple GBPs71102
The website URL redirects to another domain115115

Observations

New factors of note

In December 2023, Joy Hawkins revealed, in a webinar, the existence of a new local ranking factor: whether the business is open or closed at the time of the search. The discovery had a major impact on the local SEO community.

Therefore, Darren included this factor in this year's research, and it quickly reached fifth place in impact in the ranking. In practice, this is clearly reflected: when the business is open, it can comfortably occupy the top positions; about an hour before closing, it begins to lose visibility and, when it is effectively closed, it tends to be replaced by competitors that are still in operation.

Google prioritizes displaying publicly available businesses. In sectors like retail and food, this makes sense. In others, such as residential services or law firms, the criterion can be problematic. Darren questions, for example, whether it makes sense for a law firm to become invisible simply because it is outside of business hours.

This behavior has led some companies to artificially extend their hours or hire telephone customer service to maintain their profile as "open 24 hours." Darren warns that this may be acceptable for businesses that operate exclusively by appointment, but it is inappropriate for physical establishments where customers can visit in person. Stating unrealistic hours frustrates consumers, can generate negative reviews, and violates Google's guidelines.

Here, Darren takes a personal stance. The scores indicate that removing the address from the Company Profile often results in a loss of rankings, and he acknowledges that he has seen this happen. However, he has also observed cases where the address was removed and the rankings remained exactly the same.

This raises a question: why do some companies lose all visibility by hiding their address, while others do not?

Darren says he doesn't have a definitive answer yet, but he's investigating. For now, he's working with two hypotheses:

  1. When a profile was originally registered at one address, then changed location and removed that address to comply with guidelines, the ratings may "revert" to the previous address. In other words, they don't disappear, they just return to the location used for the initial verification.
  2. In other cases, companies remove the address, lose visibility, and confirm that the displayed address was exactly the same one used for verification. These scenarios cannot be explained by a change of location, suggesting the existence of flaws in Google's system.

Darren even cites a case where Google repositioned a company more than 300 km away, in a region completely irrelevant to the business. To identify this type of error, he uses large-scale ranking grids, covering extensive areas, until he locates where Google is positioning the company and, from there, refines the analysis with more specific grids.

In any case, Darren remains unconvinced that showing or hiding the address is, in fact, a ranking factor. To Darren, it seems like a bug. In all the cases he analyzed, the rankings didn't disappear; they just moved. They reverted to a previous address or ended up somewhere completely random and strange.

Apparently, he's the only one who thinks that way. Darren will get in touch when he has more information.

Hawkins released new research showing that the predefined services suggested by Google in the Business Profile impact rankings. This was curious because the services were so low on the list of factors (position #81) that they were almost considered a myth in the 2023 edition.

Therefore, a new factor was added this year: “Presence of predefined services in GBP”. And, as one might imagine, it obtained a very high score, ranking 22nd among the most impactful factors.

Darren also confirmed this with his own tests. Yes, the services affect the ratings.

In December 2023, Joy Hawkins revealed, in a webinar, the existence of a new local ranking factor: whether the business is open or closed at the time of the search. The discovery had a major impact on the local SEO community.

Therefore, Darren included this factor in this year's research, and it quickly reached fifth place in impact in the ranking. In practice, this is clearly reflected: when the business is open, it can comfortably occupy the top positions; about an hour before closing, it begins to lose visibility and, when it is effectively closed, it tends to be replaced by competitors that are still in operation.

Google prioritizes displaying publicly available businesses. In sectors like retail and food, this makes sense. In others, such as residential services or law firms, the criterion can be problematic. Darren questions, for example, whether it makes sense for a law firm to become invisible simply because it is outside of business hours.

This behavior has led some companies to artificially extend their hours or hire telephone customer service to maintain their profile as "open 24 hours." Darren warns that this may be acceptable for businesses that operate exclusively by appointment, but it is inappropriate for physical establishments where customers can visit in person. Stating unrealistic hours frustrates consumers, can generate negative reviews, and violates Google's guidelines.

Here, Darren takes a personal stance. The scores indicate that removing the address from the Company Profile often results in a loss of rankings, and he acknowledges that he has seen this happen. However, he has also observed cases where the address was removed and the rankings remained exactly the same.

This raises a question: why do some companies lose all visibility by hiding their address, while others do not?

Darren says he doesn't have a definitive answer yet, but he's investigating. For now, he's working with two hypotheses:

  1. When a profile was originally registered at one address, then changed location and removed that address to comply with guidelines, the ratings may "revert" to the previous address. In other words, they don't disappear, they just return to the location used for the initial verification.
  2. In other cases, companies remove the address, lose visibility, and confirm that the displayed address was exactly the same one used for verification. These scenarios cannot be explained by a change of location, suggesting the existence of flaws in Google's system.

Darren even cites a case where Google repositioned a company more than 300 km away, in a region completely irrelevant to the business. To identify this type of error, he uses large-scale ranking grids, covering extensive areas, until he locates where Google is positioning the company and, from there, refines the analysis with more specific grids.

In any case, Darren remains unconvinced that showing or hiding the address is, in fact, a ranking factor. To Darren, it seems like a bug. In all the cases he analyzed, the rankings didn't disappear; they just moved. They reverted to a previous address or ended up somewhere completely random and strange.

Apparently, he's the only one who thinks that way. Darren will get in touch when he has more information.

Hawkins released new research showing that the predefined services suggested by Google in the Business Profile impact rankings. This was curious because the services were so low on the list of factors (position #81) that they were almost considered a myth in the 2023 edition.

Therefore, a new factor was added this year: “Presence of predefined services in GBP”. And, as one might imagine, it obtained a very high score, ranking 22nd among the most impactful factors.

Darren also confirmed this with his own tests. Yes, the services affect the ratings.

Factors that have gained importance

As already mentioned, it is now known that the "Services" section directly influences the rankings. It is therefore no surprise that this factor has risen 75 positions, moving from last place (110th) to 35th.

As explained earlier, the schedule set in the profile can significantly affect rankings. Therefore, experts have started to assign much more weight to this factor, which has risen from 85th to 21st position.

This factor rose from 73rd to 41st position. Darren admits that this made him raise an eyebrow. Still, it's plausible that Google is improving location tracking via mobile devices and assigning greater weight to in-person traffic as a ranking signal. It makes sense.

This factor rose from 48th to 34th place — and Darren likes that. He believes Google is increasingly relying on user behavior signals: people who interact with your profile, view photos, read reviews, watch videos, and follow posts clearly contribute to better rankings.

This is yet another reason to keep your profile active and updated. Offer interesting content to generate interaction, and the algorithm tends to reward you. Even better: this also generates more conversions.

As already mentioned, it is now known that the "Services" section directly influences the rankings. It is therefore no surprise that this factor has risen 75 positions, moving from last place (110th) to 35th.

As explained earlier, the schedule set in the profile can significantly affect rankings. Therefore, experts have started to assign much more weight to this factor, which has risen from 85th to 21st position.

This factor rose from 73rd to 41st position. Darren admits that this made him raise an eyebrow. Still, it's plausible that Google is improving location tracking via mobile devices and assigning greater weight to in-person traffic as a ranking signal. It makes sense.

This factor rose from 48th to 34th place — and Darren likes that. He believes Google is increasingly relying on user behavior signals: people who interact with your profile, view photos, read reviews, watch videos, and follow posts clearly contribute to better rankings.

This is yet another reason to keep your profile active and updated. Offer interesting content to generate interaction, and the algorithm tends to reward you. Even better: this also generates more conversions.

Factors that have lost importance

Think about the page to which you direct the link from your Company Profile. This is usually the homepage or, for businesses with multiple locations, a location page. This page needs to be well-structured, optimized, and receive many links—both external and internal.

But how much does it matter which pages you link from it? Much less. That's why this factor dropped from 45th to 110th place. Makes sense.

There is a relatively common recommendation to link to authoritative websites from the main service pages. For example, a page about heater repair might include a link to the U.S. Department of Energy.

Does this help? It might even help credibility, but apparently local research experts consider this factor less relevant for ranking than before. It fell from 113th to 177th position.

You know those 10,000-word blog posts telling the story of grandma's apple pie before even getting to the recipe? Don't do that. People just want the recipe.

It's 2026, and huge pages are no longer trendy. The new standard is clear, concise, and high-quality content that quickly answers user questions. Get straight to the point.

This also helps with AI research. Just like people, robots don't want to read fluff.

Think about the page to which you direct the link from your Company Profile. This is usually the homepage or, for businesses with multiple locations, a location page. This page needs to be well-structured, optimized, and receive many links—both external and internal.

But how much does it matter which pages you link from it? Much less. That's why this factor dropped from 45th to 110th place. Makes sense.

There is a relatively common recommendation to link to authoritative websites from the main service pages. For example, a page about heater repair might include a link to the U.S. Department of Energy.

Does this help? It might even help credibility, but apparently local research experts consider this factor less relevant for ranking than before. It fell from 113th to 177th position.

You know those 10,000-word blog posts telling the story of grandma's apple pie before even getting to the recipe? Don't do that. People just want the recipe.

It's 2026, and huge pages are no longer trendy. The new standard is clear, concise, and high-quality content that quickly answers user questions. Get straight to the point.

This also helps with AI research. Just like people, robots don't want to read fluff.

Quotes are back!

Citations as a local SEO strategy had been losing importance in the last decade, but AI-powered SEO is giving them a new lease on life. Three of the top five visibility factors in AI-powered searches are citation factors.

In AI, mentions have become the new link.

How to get listed on Local Services Ads (LSA)

In the categories where Local Services Ads are present, they dominate the top of the SERP and capture a large portion of the clicks that previously went to the local package and organic results. Google has done an excellent job of making these ads as attractive as the local package.

Darren has clients in the personal injury field who, despite excellent results in both local and organic outcomes, generate approximately 70% of their cases through LSAs (Low-Level Laser Therapy).

If you operate in a competitive industry that displays this type of ad, you need to learn how to set up and optimize these accounts. Fortunately, many local search experts have already extensively tested what works.

The four main factors are:

  • Budget and bids
  • Reviews
  • Selection of services
  • Response time

Darren adds a nuance to the "reviews": yes, ratings and volume matter, but, just as with local SEO, the recency of reviews has proven to be a determining factor in improving visibility on LSAs.

"Title tag length" is an SEO myth

A new factor was added to the search: "title tag length". Darren was pleased to see that it appeared near the bottom of the list, low enough to be considered a myth.

For those who still insist on this: the title tag length is an SEO myth. You don't need to worry about keeping titles to 60 characters. This recommendation arose solely based on the display limit in search results, not on algorithm criteria.

Google doesn't care about title length. On the contrary: longer titles can help with ranking by including more relevant terms.

In practice, Darren usually places the most engaging text at the beginning to encourage clicks, and adds strategic keywords at the end, even if they don't appear in full on the SERPs.

Don't ignore the "Questions and Answers with Experts" section

Everyone likes graphs and rankings, but there are real gems in the open-ended questions section. One example is this observation by Claudia Tomina:

"The real-time data from Popular Times has a measurable impact on rankings. If a place is busier than usual, there's a good chance it will also be better positioned at that moment."

This year, Darren added three new open-ended questions:

  • Beyond traditional SEO work, what are you doing to influence visibility in AI-powered searches?
  • How has your perception of citations changed in the last year?
  • How do you see the future of local research?

Do yourself a favor: read this section. It's well worth it.

The future of local research

Have you tried Google's AI Mode yet? For Darren, it offers a clear glimpse into the future of local search. Traditional results are likely to be replaced by AI-generated answers. The "AI Overviews" show that Google is already testing this path; the next step is to integrate ads sustainably.

What does this change in your SEO strategy? The good news is that if you're already doing a good job, you won't need to change everything. In addition to traditional GBP and website optimization, here are some additional actions Darren recommends:

  • Seeking inclusion in "best in industry" lists compiled by experts.
  • Ensure your presence in the main industry directories (tip: ask ChatGPT or Gemini which ones are the most relevant).
  • Completely populate and optimize these listings.
  • Optimize the description with a strong semantic structure right from the first sentence.
  • Collect reviews from the main industry websites, not just Google.
  • Maintain a testimonials page on the website and link it to the main navigation.
  • Work on the website content so that it is:
    • geared towards real user questions,
    • well-structured semantically,
    • Concise, direct, confident, and factual.
  • Search for local mentions:
    • to get involved with the community,
    • writing opinion articles for regional media outlets,
    • Collaborate with local content creators.

Darren also recommends reviewing the visibility factors in AI-powered searches and the responses from the expert section.

These are some of the main highlights he observed, but this is a broad study with a lot of data. Analyze everything and let me know if you find anything interesting.

A big thank you to all the local research experts who took the time to respond to the survey and share their knowledge with the community.

Local package classification factors / Maps

Here are all the ranking factors, organized by contributors according to their impact on local package and Google Maps results.

Local organic classification factors

Below are the ranking factors, ordered by experts according to their impact on local organic results.

Visibility factors in AI research

This section lists all visibility factors ranked by contributors according to their impact on responses generated by AI-based search engines.

Ranking factors in LSA (Local Service Ads)

Here are the ranking factors organized by experts according to their influence on the positioning of Local Service Ads (LSAs).

Conversion factors

Ranking well is important, but not enough. It's also crucial to evaluate how your digital presence, Google Business Profile, website, and other assets convert visitors into customers.

Is the communication clear? Is the value proposition evident? Is there a concrete reason for the user to choose your company among so many alternatives?

This section brings together all the factors classified by contributors according to their direct impact on conversions.

Myths about local SEO

These are the factors that received the lowest combined scores. In other words, they are the elements that most experts consider to have little or no real impact on local rankings.

Negative factors

This section lists the factors that should be avoided in local SEO strategies, as they harm visibility and performance in search results.

Risk factors for suspension

This section outlines the factors most likely to result in the suspension of a Business Profile on Google, seriously compromising the brand's local presence.

Expert collaborators

The following are the experts who contributed to this edition. They are leading professionals in local SEO, strategists who work on the front lines, testing hypotheses, conducting research, producing content, and sharing, with technical depth, what truly leads companies to the top of Google's local search results.

Photo by Santiago Edo

Santiago Edo

Santiago Edo is the CEO and co-founder of Harmo, a Drive-to-Store infrastructure company that organizes digital presence, reviews, and research for over 24,000 stores. A graduate of ESPM, he has 30 years of experience in marketing, communication, and retail management. He leads the operation that serves more than 200 physical retail chains in Brazil and Latin America, including Cacau Show, DIA Brasil, and Lojas Koerich. He writes about review management, local SEO, Google company profiles, and customer satisfaction surveys applied to retail chains.

Read also

The Local Search Ranking Factors 2026 reveals a shift in local SEO: reputation, engagement, and customer experience now define who appears at the top of Google.

Check out these local SEO tips to optimize your website, manage local profiles, and encourage reviews to attract more customers from your region.

Discover how reviews and SEO connect: the weight of reviews in local ranking and in attracting new customers to your store.

Harmo Newsletter

Get reputation scores for over 24,000 stores delivered to your email. 
Subscribe to our content.

Schedule a meeting